QUESTION TEXT: A diet whose protein comes from fish…
QUESTION TYPE: Parallel Reasoning
CONCLUSION: We shouldn’t recommend that everyone eat fish.
REASONING: It’s healthier to eat fish. But if everyone eats fish, then fish would go extinct and no one could eat fish.
ANALYSIS: On parallel reasoning questions, look for structure.
Here, the structure is that we shouldn’t that recommend everyone do something, because then that thing would be destroyed. No one could do it.
___________
- The conclusion is the same, but the reasons are different. There’s no vitamin E shortage.
- The conclusion is different. This should have said that we should avoid high cigarette taxes because they will destroy smoking.
- CORRECT. Here we go. Something is good for individuals, but if everyone did it, then no one could.
- The conclusion is different. The conclusion has to say that not everyone should do something.
- Totally wrong. This just says there is uncertainty about what to do. The stimulus had a clear recommendation.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Leave a Reply