QUESTION TEXT: Scientist: Given the human tendency to explore…
QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning
CONCLUSION: There are low odds that humans will colonize the universe.
REASONING: If we colonized, most humans would be alive during the era of space colonization. We are not alive during this era, so it’s unlikely it will ever happen.
ANALYSIS: The author is attempting to make a probabilistic argument. The author’s error is that he hasn’t taken a random sample out of all humans that ever existed. He’s only looking at our time.
Imagine if you could survey all of human history and ask 1000 people at random from different times: ‘does space colonization exist?’. If they all say ‘no’, then it’s likely it never existed.
This method doesn’t work if you only survey your own time. It could just be that colonization hasn’t happened yet.
In terms of formal procedure, the argument says space colonization will never occur because a something that would probably accompany space colonization (a population explosion) hasn’t occurred yet.
___________
- Tempting, but the argument isn’t as simple as this. An example of this reasoning would be ‘He hasn’t arrived, therefore he never will’.
- This is a different error. To choose this answer you would have to be able to specify which premise was contradicted and why.
- This statement is way too broad. The argument is talking about space colonization, not all situations.
- CORRECT. The event that is likely is ‘we are alive during the era of colonization’. The given hypothesis is ‘space colonization’. So since we don’t live in an era of space colonization, it is unlikely space colonization will happen.
- This isn’t necessarily an error. For example, I’m confident in predicting that humans will still be breathing oxygen in 500 years.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Kritika says
Hi, for E you say that this isn’t an error but the question doesn’t ask for an error. It asks for the method of reasoning. Can you explain why E is not correct?
TutorLucas (LSAT Hacks) says
When graeme says “error” in this case he’s referring to the error that the argument is meant to point out – the author is arguing that the hypothesis (some people believe that the galaxy will eventually be colonized by trillions of humans) is probably false. So E doesn’t work because it doesn’t address this very important component of the argument
-Reply from LSAT Tutor, Morgan Barrett
Frank says
spelling error
way “too” broad
TutorLucas (LSAT Hacks) says
Thanks for catching that! The page has been updated.