QUESTION TEXT: Psychologist: Some have argued that Freudian…
QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning
CONCLUSION: It’s wrong to say Freudian psychotherapy is effective because of the fact that it’s slow and expensive.
REASONING: No one would say a car repair shop is good because it’s slow and expensive.
ANALYSIS: This seems like a pretty good argument. It’s an argument by analogy. Since most people would accept the conclusion about car repair shops, they’ll likely accept the analogous conclusion about Freudian psychotherapy.
There’s not much to say about the wrong answers: they didn’t happen. Instead of trying to “explain” why they’re wrong, I’ve shown an example of what that method of reasoning would look like if it had happened.
___________
- The author didn’t do this.
Example of method: Some say psychotherapy is effective because it’s hard. But anything hard isn’t worth doing. - The author didn’t do this.
Example of method: Some say psychotherapy is effective because it’s hard. But actually, psychotherapy isn’t hard. - CORRECT. The conclusion about car repair shops is the analogous statement. Most people would agree with that conclusion. The author hopes we’ll think that car repair is comparable to psychotherapy.
- The author didn’t do this.
Example of method: Some say psychotherapy is a good idea because it’s hard, and as evidence they say we think learning a language is a good idea because it’s hard. But this analogy is wrong: language learning has proven results, whereas psychotherapy has no track record of good results. - The author didn’t do this.
Example of method: Some say psychotherapy causes increased confidence. But actually, people only go to psychotherapy because they become confident enough to talk about their problems with a stranger.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Daniela Papadakis says
So on this types of arguments I’m allowed to think outside of the information given to me in the paragraph? What other types of arguments are similar in this way? Also do you just do the premise, conclusion and flaw in every question, keep it simple? or do you know and use other types of clues?