LG Game 3 Question 16 Explanation
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
A is wrong because F is before G in the snack row in both scenarios.
B is wrong. In the first scenario, I is before G in juices. In the second scenario, I is before G in snacks.
C is wrong. In the first scenario, I is before H in juices. In the second scenario, I is before H in snacks.
D is CORRECT. I could be before F in both rows in the second scenario. Here’s one way it could look:
E is wrong. In the first scenario, H is before I in snacks. In the second scenario, H is before I in juices.
Want a free Logic Games lesson?
Get a free sample of the Logic Games Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for going faster at logic games
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.
You should check out LSATHacks Pro
LSATHacks Pro has explanations for 6300+ LSAT questions, and over 50 hours of courses. All for $49.99/month. Join the club and I'll teach you how to think like a 170+ scorer.
LSATHacks Pro comes with a ten-day moneyback guarantee. You can find more reviews on the LSAT mastery seminars page. Many have seen improvement within a few days!
---------
Photos and Updates: If you have a question, you can follow us on Instagram here or send an email.
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
Leave a Reply