LSAT 23, Logic Game 2, Question 8, LSATHacks

If we don’t interview Mayer, we don’t hire M or K.

A is wrong. It’s too strong. We only know that K is not hired. K could still be interviewed.

B is doesn’t have to be true. Kowalski might be interviewed but there’s no reason they have to be.

C doesn’t have to be true. If Fu is hired, Kowalski only needs to be interviewed, not hired.

D doesn’t have to be true. Fu could be hired, but he doesn’t have to be.

E is CORRECT. Fu is always interviewed. And we know Kowalski is not hired because M is not interviewed.

Quick Jump PT Section Que