QUESTION TEXT: Most students are bored by history courses as they are…
QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption – Exception
CONCLUSION: The best way to teach history is to tell stories about historical people. Statistics and dates be damned.
REASONING: Most students are bored by history classes, because they spend much time talking about dates and statistics.
ANALYSIS: There are many flaws with this argument. The best way to do this type of question is to think of a few, then eliminate wrong answers by referring to the passage.
The author assumes:
- There’s not an even better way to teach history.
- Students aren’t bored by historical figures, too.
- You can teach history without spending much time on dates and figures.
- It’s not a good idea to bore your students. (It’s no good to entertain students but teach them nothing.)
___________
- If it’s fine to bore students, then maybe dates and statistics are the way to go.
- If history can’t be taught without spending much time on dates and statistics, then this new plan is a bad idea.
- CORRECT. The argument didn’t say we should never spend time on dates and statistics. We should just refer to them less. So it’s not a big deal if you have to throw a few dates into your historical stories.
- If this isn’t true, then telling stories about dead people isn’t the best way to teach history.
- If students would be even more bored by history classes about historical figures, then it’s not a good idea to spend the whole class talking about them.
Recap: The question begins with “Most students are bored by history courses as they are”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn more about LSAT Necessary questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.
Leave a Reply