LSAT 26, Reading Comprehension, Q16, LSATHacks

RC Question 16 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: This is partly a trick question. You need to reread the start of the fourth paragraph, where the author critiques the research described in the third paragraph.

The author does a few things. First, the cause
(a massive algal bloom) occurs without the effect in the gulf of Mexico.

Second, the timing of the algal bloom was wrong, meaning that the effect happened without the proposed cause.

Third, the author points out that we don’t know the effects of brevetoxin.

The author never says that any of the researchers’ facts are wrong. But the author adds new facts that make us doubt the researchers’ conclusion.

___________

1. CORRECT. See discussion. The author adds new facts that make us question the researchers’ conclusion.
2. The author was not supporting the researchers theory. He disagreed with them.
3. The author isn’t revising a past theory, he’s critiquing a current theory.
4. A prescription is a solution. The author hasn’t said what we should do, and neither did the researchers.
5. The author is attacking the researchers’ theory, not reproducing it.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.