LSAT 30, Logical Reasoning I, Q19, LSATHacks

LR Question 19 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Columnist: A recent study suggests that living with a…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle – Must be False

CONCLUSION: The government should not tax activities that increase the risk of death.

REASONING: Everyone (including the author) agrees that the government should not tax cancer-causing parrots. Therefore other special taxes on other dangerous activities should also be avoided. 

ANALYSIS: This argument sounds silly but it may be correct, if parrots really do cause cancer and there aren’t further reasons to tax the other dangerous activities. 

The principle is that we shouldn’t try to protect the public from dangerous activities by taxing those activities. 

___________

1. The columnist might agree to taxes that fund education. They just don’t think those dangerous activities should be taxed specifically because of the danger.
2. The columnist is fine with not taxing.
3. CORRECT. The columnist hates this idea. If we don’t tax dangerous parrots then why should we tax anything dangerous! 
4. “Should not create financial disincentives” means “don’t tax.” The columnist is fine with that. 
5. The columnist might be fine with this. The only taxes we know he doesn’t like are those that try to protect the public from danger. 

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.