LSAT 31, Reading Comprehension, Q21, LSATHacks

RC Question 21 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: Only the first two paragraphs talked about objectivists vs. subjectivists. The rest of the passage focussed on how to make the two sides understand each other.

___________

1. This only talks about what subjectivists should do. But the passage didn’t say that objectivists were right and subjectivists were wrong.
2. Same as A. This only criticizes objectivists. But the passage didn’t say which side was right.
3. Paragraph three says the two sides may never agree. The passage isn’t arguing for agreement, it’s arguing the two side should understand each other. 
4. CORRECT. They may never agree, but at least they can understand what they’re arguing about. 
5. This ignores the final three paragraphs. 

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.