LSAT 41, Logical Reasoning I, Q24, LSATHacks

LR Question 24 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Ethicist: In general it is wrong to use medical treatments…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: Some restricted nonconsensual medical research should be allowed (in medical emergencies).

REASONING: While nonconsensual research is generally wrong (because patients have a right to be informed), progress in emergency treatment requires nonconsensual research.

ANALYSIS: We have a conflict between patients’ rights, and overall medical knowledge.

___________

1. Not a necessary assumption. Research could still be required even if doctors only occasionally did not know the best treatment.
2. Not a necessary assumption. There could be other reasons why nonconsensual research is required. In emergency situations patients are often unconscious and unable to consent.
3. Not necessary. The argument implies that the main benefit of the research is for future patients.
4. Definitely not necessary. This is a very extreme statement. The stimulus takes pains to say that consent can be waived only on a restricted basis.
5. CORRECT. Yes. If this assumption isn’t true, the argument falls apart. Patient consent always takes precedence, and research is never justified without consent.

Recap: The question begins with “Ethicist: In general it is wrong to use medical treatments”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn more about LSAT Necessary questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.