QUESTION TEXT: Activist: As electronic monitoring of employees grows more…
QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning
CONCLUSION: The employer’s explanations are flawed (because they are self-serving).
ANALYSIS: This is a type of ad hominem attack. The activist is attacking the employer’s motives, not their argument. Never a good strategy: a villain can still speak the truth.
___________
- No. They didn’t attack the argument at all. They attacked the employers.
- The activist didn’t go that far, they just don’t think such behavior justifies surveillance.
- We don’t know what standard was used in the past.
- CORRECT. Bingo. The activist says the employers are wrong because their motives are impure.
- There is no sample here. We don’t know how many employees or employers are at issue.
Recap: The question begins with “Activist: As electronic monitoring of employees grows more”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. Learn how to master LSAT Flaw questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.
Leave a Reply