LSAT 43, Logical Reasoning II, Q26, LSATHacks

LR Question 26 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: In the aftermath of the Cold War, international relations…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle

ANALYSIS: Old friends begin to fight once the tough times end. It’s a pretty common scenario.

___________

1. It wouldn’t matter which is the greater cause of tension. The important point is that economic tensions are now higher for the former allies.
2. It shouldn’t matter in which circumstance bonds are higher. The important point is that they are no longer allies and economic relations are now tense.
3. Allied countries by definition have a military commitment. However, “more easily reached” is pretty weak – it could mean things were only 5% easier. In the stimulus there were no negotiations required on many issues, and now “tactful negotiations” are needed. That’s a pretty big difference.
4. That’s too strong. The allies may still have considered economics important, but just not worth bickering about. Also, we don’t know if war was threatened.
5. CORRECT. Yes. It’s a reasonable assumption that allies share a common enemy. The economic problems were previously ignored, and they are now quite bothersome.

Recap: The question begins with “In the aftermath of the Cold War, international relations”. It is a Principle question. Learn more about LSAT Principle questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.