LG Game 4 Question 19 Explanation, by LSATHacks
This question confused me. I couldn’t see how assigning Farber to Romania determined anything. But once you look at both scenarios, you can spot a must be true. Here are the two scenarios:
Now put F in Romania:
It turns out that H is in Spain in both scenarios. I hadn’t expected that, but that’s the power of drawing things out. B is CORRECT.
(The reason this was confusing to me is that F didn’t cause H to be in Spain in the first scenario. It was already there. It’s possible if I had figured out less in advance I would have found this question easier. But of course you shouldn’t let confusion slow you on logic games: just draw what the question tells you to, and the rules will usually lead you to the answer. It’s sitting still and “thinking” that will slow you down and produce nothing.)
Want a free Logic Games lesson?
Get a free sample of the Logic Games Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for going faster at logic games
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.
Check out LSATHacks All Access
It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
Leave a Reply