LG Game 1 Question 3 Explanation, by LSATHacks
You’re looking for something that can’t be true.
This question tests whether you combined the third rule with the other rules. If you did that, then you know H has to come after G and K.
C is CORRECT.
I’m not drawing scenarios to prove all the other answers correct, as you’ll benefit more from trying them yourself. But here’s proof that A is possible, for example:
The general rule is that if something isn’t explicitly forbidden by the rules, it’s allowed. So this diagram would also work to disprove A:
F is fourth in both diagrams. Neither is better than the other, they’re both perfectly good proofs that A is possible and therefore wrong.
For all the wrong answers on this question there are many scenarios that disprove them.
Any drawing you make that doesn’t violate one of the rules from the setup is a valid drawing. It’s good practice to make them for all answers, quickly, when reviewing.
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.
I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle
If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.
---------
Updates:
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
Leave a Reply