LSAT 65, Reading Comprehension, Q23, LSATHacks

RC Question 23 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: This is lines 12-15. The farmland is heavily fertilized. The quickest way to fix this would be to replace the topsoil.

Logically, we must be replacing the over-fertilized topsoil with soil that has less fertilizer. Otherwise, why bother?

___________

1. We know that thistles grow in fertilized land (lines 10-11). Fertilized land is a sufficient condition. But it’s possible thistles can grow even in soil that isn’t fertilized.
2. We have no idea if replacement topsoil has fungi. Presumably all soil has some fungi. The third paragraph shows that both farmed and unfarmed soil has fungi (lines 38-50). 
3. Why would this be true? We’re not told anything about the replacement soil. Maybe it has tons of good plants.
4. CORRECT. This would make sense. We’re replacing over-fertilized topsoil. So it would make sense to use soil that has less fertilizer. 
5. Who knows? The soil just has to be good soil. It’s possible it was used to grow corn, then rehabilitated.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.