QUESTION TEXT: Residents of a coastal community are resisting the…
QUESTION TYPE: Principle – Strengthen
CONCLUSION: Residents want to stop a landowner from building on a landscape that had been used in a painting by a famous painter.
REASONING: The building would hurt the community’s artistic and historic heritage.
ANALYSIS: The family wants to build a house. They have a legal right to do so.
The community has an artistic interest in not having a building built. To support the argument, we need to show that this community interest somehow restricts the family’s legal right to built on their property.
___________
- The passage isn’t talking about preserving a historic building! Instead, it’s talking about preventing a building from being built.
- This tells us the community should buy the land. That’s no good. We’re trying to support the argument that the community has a say in how the land is used even if they don’t own it.
- This principle tells us that the artist could ask the landowner not to build a building. But the artist is dead! This is no help.
- CORRECT. In this case, the community does have a historic and artistic interest in not having the new building built. So this answer suggests the family’s right to build is constrained.
- This talks about what the law should say. But the stimulus said there’s no law against building a building. So this doesn’t help the argument that the landlord still shouldn’t build a building.
Daniela says
In the logic reasoning summary you say that I need to look for the premise, conclusion and flaw. What is the flaw here? Im having issues finding them sometimes.
Founder Graeme Blake says
So flaw has a couple of meanings on the lsat. Sometimes it is an obvious problem. Other times it is simply making an argument that isn’t fully justified. For example if I say: “I like dogs, so I should get a dog”. I haven’t made any horrendous mistake, but I also haven’t really justified my position.
That’s what happened in this question, and the right answer adds justification.
Note: This is an old comment but I wanted to clarify the point.