• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSATHacks Pro
  • Course
  • Mastery seminars
  • Tutoring
  • Books
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 74 » Logic Games » Game 3 Setup

LSAT 74, Game 3 Setup, Woven Rugs

LSAT 74 Explanations

LG Game 3 Setup

This is an explanation of the third logic game from Section II of LSAT Preptest 74, the December 2014 LSAT. Game three involves the following setup:

There are six colors of thread: forest, olive, peach, turquoise, white, and yellow (F, O, P, T, W, Y). Five out of six colors of thread will be use to create three woven rugs. The rugs are either made from a single color or several colors. The rules allow you to determine the possible color composition of the three rugs.

Game Setup

This is a tricky game to explain. It’s not necessarily a hard game to do. That’s because this game depends on your ability to see how the rules combine. There are almost no upfront deductions, and not even a good general template you can make. So my explanations for this are limited because I can’t go inside your mind to show you how to see the game.

This game is a test of your visualization abilities. I am firmly convinced that how you lay diagrams out on your page significantly affects how well and fast you can do games. I do two things:

  • My main diagram is on the second page, just under the questions.
  • I make new diagrams for each question that requires it.

This significantly reduces eye tracking time. If your diagram is right beside answers, there is no delay between seeing the diagram and judging whether an answer is possible.

Having the main diagram on the second page also helps you reference it faster. I don’t draw anything else in the main diagram area. Having a page free of clutter reduces how hard your brain has to work at understanding the diagram.

There’s one more trick: make things explicit.

For instance, suppose a question places O and P. It’s helpful to then draw a list of who’s left beside the diagram: F, W, T, Y.

Drawing F, W, T, Y seems obvious, and therefore useless. But having the remaining variables visible lets you mentally move them onto the diagram. This removes the need to draw multiple diagrams to test the slight changes.

Ok, enough preamble. Lets see how to draw these rules. I’ll note that there are rules in the setup paragraph too:

  • Exactly 5/6 rug colors are used.
  • Rug colors aren’t repeated.

The first one is most important. If one color is out, that means all the other colors are in.

Note also that no rug can have more than three colors. The possible color distributions among rugs are as follows:

  • 3-1-1
  • 2-2-1

Those are the only ways to have three rugs that have a total of five colors.

Ok, the first rule: if white is used, then two other colors are used.

LSAT Preptest 74, Game 3 Setup, Diagram 1

Note that this forces the game into a 3-1-1 color distribution.

Next, if orange is in, then it goes with peach. This leads to a deduction I’ll discuss later:

LSAT Preptest 74, Game 3 Setup, Diagram 2

Rules 3, 4 and 5 say who can’t go together:

LSAT Preptest 74, Game 3 Setup, Diagram 3

This last rule isn’t worth completely memorizing. Instead, have a clear drawing that you can reference in a split-second. Though I did remember that both peach and turquoise were mentioned in two of the exclusion rules.

I mentioned there was a deduction. Deductions come from looking at all of the rules and thinking about how they interact. Deductions also come from past experience on other games. If you know past games well enough, you’ll see similar deductions on new games.

We need five colors. If any one color is out, then all the others are in.

This has a big effect on peach. If orange is out, then peach is in (because all other colors are in). And if orange is in, then peach is in (rule 2).

So either way, peach is always in. This solves question 12 instantly. Surprisingly, this deduction wasn’t useful on any of the other questions.

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Main Diagram




Want a free Logic Games lesson?

Get a free sample of the Logic Games Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for going faster at logic games

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

You should check out LSATHacks Pro

LSATHacks Pro has explanations for 6300+ LSAT questions, and over 50 hours of courses. All for $49.99/month. Join the club and I'll teach you how to think like a 170+ scorer.

LSATHacks Pro comes with a ten-day moneyback guarantee. You can find more reviews on the LSAT mastery seminars page. Many have seen improvement within a few days!
---------
Photos and Updates: If you have a question, you can follow us on Instagram here or send an email.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Grace says

    December 4, 2015 at 5:13 am

    I want to ask, can the game has 3-2 color distribution? if I put W with O and P, then T with Y. it could be 3-2 distribution ( WOP, TY). I think that could work, but I am not sure!
    thank you!

    Reply
    • FounderGraeme says

      May 9, 2016 at 10:29 pm

      You mean, leaving the third rug empty? That’s not possible, as the rules state there are three rugs, and they all need at least one color.

      Reply
  2. MemberDena Rubanowitz says

    October 4, 2015 at 8:23 pm

    Isn’t there one other deduction? Since if you have o then you have p, and p can’t be with t, then you can’t have O and T together!

    Reply
    • FounderGraeme Blake says

      October 7, 2015 at 10:07 pm

      Yeah, no OT and no OY. I don’t feel it’s useful to draw that though. For me, I see O as OP, so I see it can’t combine with T or Y.

      By adding those two deductions you have five not rules to check instead of three. For me it’s a cognitive slowdown to check them all.

      If you find yourself forgetting things like no OT and no OY, then you should draw them. Students who make few mistakes are probably better off sticking to remembering that O is OP, and therefore combines with no PT and no PY.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks Pro: Get every course on LSATHacks for $49.99/month

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks Pro

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for $49.99/month, satisfaction guaranteed, no minimum commitment. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/lsathacks-pro/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2022 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping