QUESTION TEXT: Harry Trevalga: You and your publication have unfairly…
QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption
CONCLUSION: The publisher concludes that the poetry editor did not discriminate against Trevalga.
REASONING: The poetry editor judges the poems without ever seeing the names of the poets.
ANALYSIS: The publisher is assuming that the editor will have to be impartial even if they do bear a grudge against Trevalga. Why? Because the names of the poets aren’t given.
The publisher is assuming that names are the only way to identify a poet. But it’s often the case that we can recognize a writer by their style.
___________
- The publisher’s argument is that the editor could not discriminate against Trevalga even if the editor did bear a grudge: the editor doesn’t get to see the names of the poets.
- It’s possible it is unusual that Trevalga was never published. But that doesn’t hurt the publisher’s argument as long as Trevalga wasn’t being excluded because the editor recognized his work.
- CORRECT. If the editor could recognize Trevalga’s work another way (perhaps his writing style) then the editor could discriminate against Trevalga’s poems even though Trevalga’s name isn’t on the poem.
- The opposite of this assumption is: the editor’s decisions were based strictly on artistic merit. That actually helps the publisher’s argument.
- This is irrelevant since the editor doesn’t see any of the names.
Recap: The question begins with “Harry Trevalga: You and your publication have unfairly”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn more about LSAT Necessary questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.
Leave a Reply