QUESTION TEXT: John’s literature professor believes that the ability to judge…
QUESTION TYPE: Must be True
FACTS:
- Judge greatness of literary works ➞ years of specialized training
- Literature professor ➞ years of specialized training
- Public (most) ➞ years of specialized training
ANALYSIS: We can combine the third statement with the contrapositive of statements 1 and 2. We get:
Public (most) ➞ years of specialized training ➞ literature professor AND judge greatness of literary works
Or, put in plain English: “Most of the public will be unable to be a professor or judge the greatness of literary works. This is because they don’t have access to the necessary specialized training.”
___________
- This isn’t true. We only know that John’s professor has a necessary condition for judging the greatness of literary works. (The professor has specialized training)
- This isn’t true. The stimulus only said that specialized training is necessary for judging literary works. This training also happens to be a necessary condition for being a professor, but that doesn’t mean that being a professor has anything to do with judging works.
E.g. You need to breathe to be a lawyer, and you need to breathe to be an artist. But that doesn’t mean you need to be a lawyer to be an artist (or vice versa). The only thing lawyer/artist have in common is that they share a necessary condition. - When an answer says “should”, it is making a moral claim. The stimulus only talked about what is true, not what should be true.
- This doesn’t follow. We could say that most members of the public aren’t professors, but some of them could be. Most doesn’t mean all.
- CORRECT. This follows. See the analysis above. Most of the public lacks the specialized training that would let them judge the greatness of literature.
Recap: The question begins with “John’s literature professor believes that the ability to judge”. It is a Must be True question. Learn more about LSAT MBT questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.
Leave a Reply