QUESTION TEXT: Educator: Environmental factors clearly have little effect…
QUESTION TYPE: Weaken
CONCLUSION: Environment has little effect on whether a teenager will do sports.
REASONING: Family has little influence since one teenager in a family can do sports while the other doesn’t. School sports programs are generally ineffective.
ANALYSIS: The educator gives two examples of environments (family and school programs) to support the argument that environment (broadly speaking) has little impact on a teen doing sports. It could be that the educator failed to consider another environment that does have an impact, such as friends and social media trends.
___________
- Athletic ability is a physical factor, not an environmental factor. Thus, it can’t weaken the conclusion that environment has little effect on teens doing sports.
- Cool fact but how does this weaken the conclusion? It doesn’t.
- The argument isn’t about whether or not adults are enthusiastic about sports. It’s about if environmental factors can affect whether or not a teen plays sports.
- CORRECT. Yes! Different societies and different decades are also “environments”! Societal and time-period factors could definitely affect whether or not teenagers play sports.
- So a few school programs are very successful. We know from the stimulus that these programs generally aren’t successful, so overall, it’s not a strong environmental factor. This doesn’t add to the argument.
Recap: The question begins with “Educator: Environmental factors clearly have little effect”. It is a Weaken question. Learn more about LSAT Weaken questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.
Leave a Reply