DISCUSSION: The antibody tests detected the bacteria in 51/52 samples. The culture techniques only found them in 7/52. Paragraph 3 tells us that when the bacterium shrinks, it stops reproducing and can’t be cultured. Earlier in paragraph 2, we’re told that culture techniques involve growing bacterium in a petri dish.
We can actually make a logic chain here:
If bacterium shrinks ➔ can’t reproduce ➔ can’t culture ➔ can’t grow in petri dish
So we can infer from this highlighted last sentence that V. cholerae can’t always be grown in a petri dish.
___________
- CORRECT. This matches our prephrase.
- Nothing in the passage supports this; in fact, we’re told that the antibodies are an effective way to detect V. cholerae, suggesting that they bond quite well.
- Colwell presents temperature and salinity as possible factors that awaken V. cholerae from its dormancy, but inferring that they are the “primary” reasons is extreme.
- Human waste is presented as a method through which the bacteria spreads, not a source of culture samples. Human tissue isn’t mentioned.
- Wrong, the fluorescent molecule is introduced by the antibodies.
Leave a Reply