LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 138 › Logical Reasoning › Question 23

LSAT 138 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q23

LSAT Preptest 138 explanations

LR Question 23 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Art historian: This painting, purportedly by Mary…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: The painting is not a genuine Cassett. It is a forgery.

REASONING: Many elements are similar to Cassett paintings. But the brush style is different from any work known to be Cassett’s.

ANALYSIS: We’re not told whether any other Cassett paintings have unique elements. If other Cassett paintings have unique elements then it’s not clear why a unique brush style implies forgery.

___________

  1. Who cares? It’s only important that it’s possible for a forger to use those materials. It doesn’t have to be easy.
  2. CORRECT. If other Cassett paintings have unique brush styles, then why does it matter that this painting has a unique brush style?
  3. It doesn’t matter whether subject matter is unique to Cassett, as long as the subject matter is consistent with the subject matter used in Cassett’s paintings.
  4. It only matters that brush style is a characteristic feature. It doesn’t have to be the most characteristic feature.
  5. This could explain why the forger failed, but it doesn’t matter. It only matters whether the brush style is indeed different from Cassett’s.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 138
Next Question

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. alia says

    July 5, 2017 at 12:34 pm

    I was tempted to chose B but ultimately changed by answer because of the word “known” I thought that maybe we should not chose this because what if she has unknown pieces that use that brush style. Would this be wrong because the stimulus says “not found in any works known to be Cassatt’s?” Also for D is the negation of “most” some? Thanks!

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      July 10, 2017 at 11:03 am

      We wouldn’t be able to make the claim that “none of Cassatt’s works is painted using a brush style that is not exhibited in any of her known or unknown works” because the brush style of an unknown Cassatt is by definition unknown. We can only work with the Cassatt paintings we know.

      Re: (D), this is another sense of “most” than the one that we’re used to in necessary assumption questions. When “most” refers to a quantity (the sense we’re used to), then we negate it to “not most”, which could mean “a few”, or a restricted sense of “some” (less than or equal to 50%).

      The negation of “most characteristic” is not the most characteristic — so, “the least characteristic”.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms