LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 139 › Logical Reasoning › Question 8

LSAT 139 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q8

LSAT Preptest 139 explanations

LR Question 8 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: To qualify as a medical specialist, one must usually…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: If you’re a recognized medical specialist, then you’re competent in your specialty.

REASONING: You must study for quite a while and pass an evaluation to be a medical specialist.

ANALYSIS: Doing something for a long time doesn’t automatically make you competent. It’s possible these medical graduates don’t know what they’re doing, even after training.

The argument has to assume that anyone who has trained that long is competent. Or anyone who is a recognized medical specialist is competent.

___________

  1. The conclusion is about competence. This answer  is about motivation. Unfortunately, being motivated doesn’t automatically make you good.
  2. This isn’t quite good enough. Being a doctor is hard. Maybe being among the most talented people doesn’t guarantee you are competent.For instance, only the most talented students apply to Yale, but that doesn’t guarantee they all get in.
  3. CORRECT. This works. It’s a conditional statement: complete evaluation ➞ competentWe know that the doctors completed an evaluation. Using that condition is a required link in the argument.This is actually a sufficient assumption as well as a necessary assumption. If we know this is true, the argument is 100% correct.
  4. This is a sufficient assumption answer. This proves the argument true if it’s correct, but it’s not necessary. We can see that by negating it while still trying to keep the argument valid.
Negation: six to ten years of medical training isn’t always sufficient for competence, however, the incompetent practitioners are weeded out by the medical specialty board.
  5. This answer makes it harder for doctors to be competent. That goes against what we’re trying to prove.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 139
Next Question

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. mahmud brifkani says

    November 21, 2015 at 8:50 pm

    I have to disagree with you on D. It’s wrong, but not because of “usually”? You are implying that if D left out usually, it would be correct, but that’s not so. It’s incorrect because we don’t need to know that our necessary condition (six to ten years) is sufficient to give us competency, just medical specialist. If what you are saying is true about D not being strong enough, it would still have to be required because usually falls within the scope of all, so if the latter was required so would the former.

    Thoughts?

    Reply
    • Graeme Blake says Founder

      February 19, 2016 at 2:28 am

      Oh, you’re right. I think I slipped into evaluating it as a sufficient assumption answer. I reread C and noticed it was sufficient as well as necessary, so it may have put me in that mood.

      I edited the explanations. Thanks!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms