LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 139 › Reading Comprehension › Question 10

LSAT 139 | Section 3 | Reading Comprehension: Q10

LSAT Preptest 139 explanations

RC Question 10 Explanation

DISCUSSION: For this type of question, it’s a guarantee that there’s a specific line in the passage that will make you 100% certain of the right answer.

You should practice justifying your answer by finding that line. It doesn’t take long once you get used to doing it.

___________

  1. We’re never told about old techniques that aren’t being used. Paragraph 3 only lists techniques that are being used.
  2. Only paragraph 1 describes how tintypes work. It never mentions what chemicals are used.
  3. Pinhole cameras are mentioned in paragraph 3. We have no idea who uses them.
  4. Only paragraph 3 mentions egg whites. We have no idea what effect they produce.
  5. CORRECT. Paragraph 4 answers this. The new techniques were less expensive and produced photographs with fewer errors.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 139
Next Question

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Gordon says

    June 9, 2017 at 1:42 pm

    “So while the stains and imperfection of prints made by albumen coatings…”

    This line gave me some reason to believe D was a possibility. Albumen is a synonym for egg-white.

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      June 10, 2017 at 6:53 pm

      True, but the passage suggests there’s a distinction between “photographic paper coated with egg whites”, and “prints made from albumen coatings”. Also, it’s unclear whether we could refer to these stains and imperfections as an effect that is produced (in contrast to the intentional “expressive effects” mentioned in line 23). Stains and imperfections fall into the category of the accidents and idiosyncracies that the author mentions in 37 that are then imbued with meaning by the artist/audience. You could make the case that “effect” in the answer choice could also be interpreted as meaning unintentional effects as well, but common sense dictates that the answer choice isn’t really referring to these accidents and idiosyncracies.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms