LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 118 › Logical Reasoning › Section 1 › Question 14

LSAT 118 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q14

PT118.S1.Q14

LSAT Preptest 118 explanations

LR Question 14 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Physician: In order to investigate diseases caused by …

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: The proposed HGH study should be prohibited.

REASONING: Medical research should only be allowed if it is:

  1. Likely to reveal important information about a medical condition

AND

  1. Known to pose minimal risk to the subjects

ANALYSIS: This is a pretty straightforward question, but the stimulus involves a lot of fluff. You can generally ignore most of the background info on HGH.

The important part is that we’re given a rule for when medical research should be allowed. It has to satisfy those 2 conditions.

The conclusion is that this HGH study shouldn’t be allowed.

If we want to strengthen that, we need to show that it fails to meet one or both of those conditions.

So, an answer has to tell us one or multiple of the following:

  1. The study is NOT likely to reveal important info about a condition
  2. The study poses more than a minimal risk to the subjects OR we don’t know the risks.

On the second condition, notice that it says “known to pose minimal risk.” So if the risks are unknown, it fails the second condition.

___________

  1. The rule says nothing about allocating resources to the most serious diseases. That’s a new condition this answer introduces.
  2. If 10,000 children have already received synthetic HGH without obvious side effects, that makes the study look safer. So this might help us determine that the study meets the second condition (minimal risk). This doesn’t give us a reason to conclude that the study should be prohibited.
  3. Tempting because the subjects are children. But the physician’s rule never mentions consent. Like A, this introduces a new condition.
  4. The physician says the study investigates diseases caused by hormonal imbalances. Even if hormonal imbalances themselves are not medical conditions, the diseases they cause certainly could be. This doesn’t undermine either requirement.
  5. CORRECT. If the long-term effects of synthetic HGH are unknown, then it is not known that the study poses only minimal risk. This means that the study fails the second condition for approval, so it should be prohibited.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 118
Next Question

Section 1 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Q14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms