LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 152 › Logical Reasoning › Section 1 › Question 23

LSAT 152 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q23

PT152.S1.Q23

LSAT Preptest 152 explanations

LR Question 23 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Male boto dolphins often carry objects such as weeds …

QUESTION TYPE: Parallel Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Carrying objects is likely a mating display.

REASONING: If it was play behavior, females and juveniles would also do it, but only males do.

ANALYSIS: The argument is using the absence of an expected indicator to undermine one explanation, and therefore suggesting the likelihood of another explanation.

The structure is:

  • If X -> we would expect Y.
  • Not Y.
  • So probably not X.

The answer should match that structure.

___________

  1. This is a different structure. It’s saying: If X (traffic) -> Y (late). I expect not Y, therefore likely not X. There’s no rejection of a hypothesis because an expected sign is missing.
  2. There are no competing hypotheses here. It’s just a clean conditional chain.
  3. This is affirming the pattern: If X -> Y. Y, so probably X. We needed not Y.
  4. CORRECT. This is the same structure. If hypothesis X were true -> expect evidence Y. Not Y, so therefore probably not X.
  5. This is just applying a conditional. No competing hypothesis is undermined by missing evidence.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 152
Next Question

Section 1 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • Q23
  • 24
  • 25

More Resources for Parallel Reasoning Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Parallel Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers parallel reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms