LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 155 › Logical Reasoning › Question 25

LSAT 155 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q25

LSAT Preptest 155 explanations

LR Question 25 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Art critic: An arrangement of objects tends to be aesthetically…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle – Justify

PRINCIPLE: An arrangement of objects is generally considered more aesthetically pleasing if it seems like the person who created it succeeded at what they wanted to do.

ANALYSIS: The principle we’re given can be used to determine whether something tends to be considered aesthetically pleasing. We have to have evidence of whether it looks like the creator accomplished what they set out to do. Note it doesn’t matter whether they themselves think they were successful – it’s from a neutral observer’s point of view.

If something looks exactly how the artist intended it, but people think the artist messed it up, it won’t look aesthetically pleasing according to our principle. Similarly, if the artist messed it up but people think the artist perfectly executed their vision, it’s likely to be considered aesthetically pleasing.

___________

  1. We can’t use our principle to conclude that an arrangement of objects should be arranged to be more in line with the creator’s vision. We just know whether something is aesthetically pleasing or not.
  2. Remember that it doesn’t matter how the artist actually wanted them. If it’s not aesthetically pleasing, our principle says it might be because people don’t think it looks like how the artist wanted it.
  3. This is trying to work backwards. We can’t say that everything that isn’t pleasing is because people don’t think the artist executed their vision.
  4. CORRECT. This tells us that if we make the installation seem more like the artist got what they wanted, it would be more aesthetically pleasing. That’s exactly what our principle tells us we can conclude.
  5. It doesn’t matter whether it looks perfectly planned. It matters whether it looks like the artist accomplished what they wanted.

Recap: The question begins with “Art critic: An arrangement of objects tends to be aesthetically”. It is a Principle Justify question. Learn how to master LSAT Principle Justify questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 155
Next Question

More Resources for Principle Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Principle questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers principle questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms