LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 155 › Logical Reasoning › Question 23

LSAT 155 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q23

LSAT Preptest 155 explanations

LR Question 23 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Researcher: Consumption of turmeric, a basic ingredient…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: Consumption of turmeric probably slows cognitive decline.

REASONING: Our research team analyzed a database and found that those who ate curries regularly scored higher on cognitive-function tests than those who rarely or never ate curries. This was most true for the elderly Singapore residents of Indian ethnicity.

ANALYSIS: When looking at this argument, notice that the last sentence is not really used for anything. Curry-eaters scored higher, curry-eaters of Indian ethnicity scored highest. It would strengthen the argument if there was a way to use this to further illustrate the point.

You probably noticed some flaws in the argument as well. For example, the researcher attributes the effect to turmeric even though that’s only one ingredient. Secondly, this is a classic case of correlation and causation. Maybe people who have better cognitive function are more attracted to curry – it’s hard to say that one certainly causes the other.

The correct answer will probably either address a flaw or use the Indian curry-eaters to strengthen the logic.

___________

  1. This doesn’t change or reframe the evidence in a meaningful way. It doesn’t make us more certain that curry has an effect than the argument itself.
  2. This weakens the argument by using one of the flaws we listed above. That doesn’t strengthen the conclusion.
  3. This may be true, but it doesn’t help the conclusion. We want to draw a stronger line between curry (especially turmeric) and cognitive health.
  4. This doesn’t help the argument or weaken it. We’re comparing Singaporeans to Singaporeans, it doesn’t matter what others eat.
  5. CORRECT. If Indian curries contain more turmeric, and Indian curry-eaters scored higher, it strengthens the correlation.

Recap: The question begins with “Researcher: Consumption of turmeric, a basic ingredient”. It is a Strengthen question. Learn how to master LSAT Strengthen questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 155
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms