LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 157 › Logical Reasoning › Question 10

LSAT 157 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q10

LSAT Preptest 157 explanations

LR Question 10 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The Industrial Revolution decreased the value that society…

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: Our most important intellectual skills will be devalued by electronic data-processing technology.

REASONING: The Industrial Revolution led to a devaluing of physical labour because it allowed unskilled workers to produce things more efficiently than skilled workers could previously. Similarly, moderately well-trained high school students can use calculators to quickly do computations that previously took mathematicians a long time.

ANALYSIS: Sometimes, Weaken questions are almost a spot-the-difference game in that the evidence for the conclusion doesn’t quite match the conclusion itself. In these situations, this difference is a way to attack the question’s conclusion, and the correct answer will reflect that.

Here, the conclusion refers to the “most important intellectual skills”. You probably wouldn’t say “doing complex calculations” are the most important intellectual skills, but that’s the only thing the evidence addresses. If the test writers wanted you to equate computational skills and important intellectual skills, they would have said so. But they didn’t, there’s no evidence to support it, and you should take notice.

___________

  1. This doesn’t weaken the argument. The reason for the improvement in technology is not relevant to whether the technology will devalue important intellectual skills.
  2. It doesn’t matter if there have already been improvements before now – there were improvements before the Industrial Revolution, too! The author is only saying that technology will devalue these skills in the future.
  3. The age of the skilled person is not relevant to the author’s conclusion that their skills will be devalued.
  4. CORRECT. This breaks the author’s analogy. They rely on computational skills being representative of the most important intellectual skills.
  5. This is incorrect. It might be evidence for electronic data-processing technology being more effective than skilled people, but that does not weaken the argument.

Recap: The question begins with “The Industrial Revolution decreased the value that society”. It is a Weaken question. Learn more about LSAT Weaken questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 157
Next Question

More Resources for Weaken Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms