LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 157 › Logical Reasoning › Question 22

LSAT 157 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q22

LSAT Preptest 157 explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Philosopher: Philosophers usually treat emotions as nonrational…

QUESTION TYPE: Role in Argument

CONCLUSION: Emotion is not nonrational.

REASONING: Philosophers usually treat emotion as nonrational. It seems this way because language lacks the ability to convey adequate conceptions of emotion. The words used to refer to emotion only name general kinds of inner experience. For example, there is no language to describe how one joy differs from another.

ANALYSIS: This question wants you to see the “Thus” and assume it’s the conclusion. Don’t fall for it!

The philosopher has presented a general view: the idea that emotions are nonrational. The philosopher then tells us that they disagree – emotions are not nonrational. They next tell us why philosophers might generally think emotion is nonrational (because language can’t convey adequate conceptions). In this last part, the author is conveying that if there were adequate language to describe emotions, philosophers would recognize that it is rational.

The proposition that there is no language for describing just how one joy differs from another is used as an example to illustrate the philosopher’s claimed explanation for why the other philosophers think what they do. This indirectly supports the conclusion, because it supports that the author’s understanding is correct.

___________

  1. It is an example of a phenomenon, but not a phenomenon that the argument seeks to explain. The author is seeking to convince the reader that emotion is not nonrational, by explaining how people mistakenly conclude that it is.
  2. Don’t get fooled by the “thus”! This is a specific example used to illustrate a general claim.
  3. CORRECT. See above.
  4. This proposition is not a concession to the other side. It illustrates the author’s belief and shows that their understanding is more correct.
  5. This proposition is not an explanation for anything. It’s a specific example illustrating an explanation.

Recap: The question begins with “Philosopher: Philosophers usually treat emotions as nonrational”. It is a Role in Argument question. Learn more about LSAT Role questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 157
Next Question

More Resources for Role in Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Role in Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers role in argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms