LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 17 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 17 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 17 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Nuclear reactors are somtimes built in “geologically quiet”…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: In a geographically quiet region the safest sites for nuclear reactors (in terms of earthquakes) are near those places where a minor fault caused an earthquake within living memory.

REASONING: Minor faults only cause earthquakes at most once every 100,000 years. (therefore if we recently had a quake there won’t be another for about 100,000 years)

ANALYSIS: This looks like a good argument. Earthquakes are very rare in geographically quiet regions. And minor faults can produce at most 1 quake per 100,000 years. So if a minor fault just had a quake then it will be safe for at least 100,000 years.

But nowhere does the stimulus tell us that there are minor faults everywhere in a quiet region. Perhaps there are spots not near any faults at all.

The conclusion is specifically about the risk of an earthquake within a geographically quiet zone. The wrong answer choices often talk about overall safety.

___________

  1. The conclusion is only saying that within a geographically quiet region the spot least likely to be hit by an earthquake will be where an earthquake occurred recently. It doesn’t matter if there is a safer spot in a region that isn’t geographically quiet.
  2. The conclusion isn’t talking about overall safety. It’s specifically about the likelihood of an earthquake.
  3. CORRECT. If there are reactor sites not near any minor faults then those sites might be even safer from earthquakes.
  4. The stimulus doesn’t say whether a reactor will survive an earthquake. It talks about the likelihood of an earthquake occurring near a reactor site.
  5. The argument wouldn’t be affected if the faults produced earthquakes less frequently. It would only be hurt if earthquakes were more frequent.

Recap: The question begins with “Nuclear reactors are somtimes built in “geologically quiet””. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Necessary questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 17
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms