LSAT 21, Reading Comprehension, Q10, LSATHacks

RC Question 10 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: This type of question is more common on later LSATs.

You’ll want to find a reference in the passage for each wrong answer.

___________

1. This is slightly tricky to eliminate. Lines 42-43 show that the law and literature school thinks that judicial opinions are not political statements. This implies that some other people argue that judicial opinions are political statements.
   Otherwise, why bother making the claim?
2. CORRECT. This is never mentioned.
3. Lines 17-22.
4. Lines 44-45.
5. Line 50.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.