Paragraph Summaries
- Native American court cases demonstrate differences between two value systems.
- Example of the Mashpee.
- The Mashpee suit failed because the US legal system couldn’t understand oral history.
Analysis
This passage has a reasonably common structure. The purpose of the passage and the conclusion come in the first paragraph: there are clashes of values when US tribes fight court cases. The tribes and the court will often fail to understand each other.
The rest of the passage is an extended example illustrating this phenomenon.
The author is sympathetic to the Mashpee, and they think courts should consider oral history as valid evidence. See lines 49-51 and lines 52-56.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply