LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 107 › Logical Reasoning › Question 22

LSAT 107 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q22

LSAT Preptest 107 explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The government claims that the country’s nuclear power plants…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle – Strengthen

FACTS:

1. The government claims that the nuclear industry poses no risk of accident.
2. Yet the government is limiting the nuclear industry’s liability in case of accident.
3. Therefore there is a risk of accident and the public is correct to be worried.

ANALYSIS: This is already a fairly reasonable argument. The government says there is no risk of harm from a nuclear accident. But also the government is limiting the nuclear industry’s requirement to pay people for damages IF there is a nuclear accident.

That’s inconsistent. If harm is impossible, then there’s no need to limit liability, as there never will be an accident. So, we have two possibilities:

  • The government is right, there is no risk. (And therefore, it is pointless to limit liability), or
  • The government is wrong, there is risk. (And therefore, limiting liability has some possible effect)

We don’t know which version is correct. It could be that there is no risk and so unlimited liability won’t affect anything. Governments sometimes have useless programs. On the other hand, there could be a real danger and the government is lying. So, we need to find something that shows the danger is real.

___________

  1. The government claimed that the power plants were safe, not unsafe.
  2. No one controls the event of an accident and no one stands to benefit financially. The nuclear industry only stands to lose financially. 
  3. This would show that the limited liability might harm the public if we already knew the reactor was unsafe. But we don’t. The reactors might well be safe whether or not the nuclear industry has a financial interest in them staying safe. 
  4. CORRECT. The government doesn’t act unless there is a danger. Since the government did act, then there is a danger. This means the government sometimes lies, since they say there is no danger. 
  5. This doesn’t tell us if a danger actually exists. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 107
Next Question

More Resources for Principle Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Principle questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers principle questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms