LSAT 30, Logical Reasoning II, Q6, LSATHacks

LR Question 6 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: We will be able to solve the problem only by adopting this plan.

REASONING: There will be a 1 billion dollar revenue shortfall. We can’t raise funds. Therefore we must cut expenditures. This plan cuts expenditures.

ANALYSIS: The commissioner is correct that the only way to balance the budget is to decrease expenditures. But they are incorrect to assume that this particular plan is the only plan that could work.

There are many ways to cut costs.

___________

1. The information sounds reasonably certain. We have no indication that the forecasters are wrong.
2. CORRECT. The commissioner’s solution is adequate. But it isn’t required: there could be other plans that would also work. 
3. The experts are experts on forecasting the budget. They have relevant expertise and it’s reasonable to rely on them.
4. There’s no vague language. The commissioner is clear that there is a problem and that only his plan can solve it.
5. You might think that this is a flaw, but on the LSAT we take people at their word. If the commissioner says there is no way to increase funds, then there is no way to increase funds. 

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.