LR Question 18 Explanation, by LSATHacks
QUESTION TEXT: The tendency toward overspecialization in the study…
QUESTION TYPE: Principle – Parallel Reasoning
CONCLUSION: The trend of overspecialization in the study of artifacts is unfortunate.
REASONING: Scholars can improve their understanding of an object by studying objects from an earlier period that influenced the object. The stimulus gives as an example the fact that Arabic porcelain influenced Spanish porcelain.
ANALYSIS: The correct answer must have two characteristics:
- Not being too narrowly specialized
- Studying something from the past that directly influenced the thing we want to study.
___________
- This may be true but it isn’t talking about studying the past to understand the present or the dangers of specialization.
- Very tempting. This does warn against specialization and it does recommend studying the past. But…it doesn’t recommend studying past events that influenced the present. It only talks about studying similar events.
- This doesn’t say if those other languages influenced French or if they only share linguistic roots with French.
- This doesn’t talk about studying the direct influences of an academic discipline.
- CORRECT. We must go beyond studying Aristotle (beyond specialization) and study the past influence of Aristotle: Plato.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.
Check out LSATHacks All Access
It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
what I don’t understand is that in the stimulus it says that it can enhance understanding, this does not mean that it completely understands so wouldn’t this answer be too strong?
Thanks.
In the stimulus’ last sentence, it says a “proper understanding”. Usually when someone properly understands something, they know everything about it, so they would more or less have a complete understanding of the subject. Also, the “completely” part in the answer choice shouldn’t be your focus here: notice that each of the answer choices begins with words like “completely understand”, “fully understand”, “fully appreciate”, and “understand properly” – they are synonyms and all mean the same thing.