LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSATHacks Pro
  • Course
  • Mastery seminars
  • Tutoring
  • Books
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 33 » Logical Reasoning 2 » Question 25

LSAT 33, Logical Reasoning II, Q25

LSAT 33 Explanations

LR Question 25 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: We are in a new industrial revolution…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption 

CONCLUSION: Business school curricula should be developed by business executives and then taught by academics.

REASONING: Business school has been too theoretical and not practical enough. 

ANALYSIS: The argument assumes that business executives could add value and it is also assumes that the academic professors could effectively teach the curriculum. 

___________

  1. This is pretty extreme. It’s only necessary that academics don’t have enough practical experience. They could have some.
  2. As with A, this is also pretty extreme. It’s only necessary that academics don’t deal with enough real situations.
  3. The stimulus actually assumes that academics are able to teach the curriculum. The conclusion says that academics should teach what business executives design.
  4. This would support the argument by showing how useless business schools have become. But it isn’t necessary. It’s only necessary that business schools aren’t responsive enough.
  5. CORRECT. If business executives don’t have any relevant knowledge to add then it’s not clear how they could improve the situation. 

Previous Question
Table Of Contents




Free Logical Reasoning lesson

Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I run LSAT Hacks, and got a 177 on the LSAT. The single best thing I've ever made is the set of LSAT Mastery seminars. They show you how to think like a 170+ scorer when doing questions. Get them here: Mastery Seminars

I guarantee you'll like them, or you get your money back within 7 days. There's no risk. Check the reviews, people have said they improved within a few days.
---------
Photos and Updates: You can follow me on Instagram here

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Comments

  1. MemberAden says

    March 31, 2021 at 8:56 pm

    1. How is E correct?? It is not necessary for business executives to have insight that the academics don’t have, being that it’s possible that really the academics have the insight, just that they’re unable to tear away from their roots, like the paragraph said!
    2. D should be the correct answer!

    Reply
    • TutorRosalie (LSATHacks) says

      April 1, 2021 at 10:06 am

      E is correct because this argument is assuming that business executives are able to facilitate “action learning”, which the stimulus says that business school academics can’t. This ability of theirs is the “valuable insight” which the business schools don’t have.

      D is out of scope. We don’t care about academic training outside of business schools. The last sentence of the stimulus tells us that they want business executives to set curricula for business schools. Not external training.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks Pro: Get every course on LSATHacks for $49.99/month

LSATHacks Pro

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for $49.99/month, satisfaction guaranteed, no minimum commitment. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/lsathacks-pro/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2022 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping