LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 110 › Logical Reasoning › Question 14

LSAT 110 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q14

LSAT Preptest 110 explanations

LR Question 14 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Some people claim that every human discovery…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: We don’t have to listen to their boring claim.

REASONING: Some people say that discovery or invention is self-expression. But everything we do is self-expression, in a trivial sense.

ANALYSIS: The argument has succeeded in showing that the claim is uninteresting. It then concludes we don’t have to pay attention.

That isn’t always true. If your house is on fire it is “trivial” to figure out that you will be hurt if you don’t try to escape. Not an intellectually interesting claim. But you should definitely listen to that advice, even though it is trivial!

The correct answer strengthens the argument by showing that we don’t have to listen to trivial things.

___________

  1. We already know that this particular claim is uninteresting. The argument says so. It doesn’t help much to know that every other trivial claim is uninteresting, too. 
  2. It doesn’t matter what most people do. “Most people” can be wrong.
  3. CORRECT. This claim is trivial; therefore it too is unworthy of serious consideration. 
  4. This would support the idea that the claim could be restated in a more interesting way. But it doesn’t affect the immediate conclusion that we don’t have to bother paying attention to their boring, dull claim. Yawn.
  5. It doesn’t really matter if every claim is trivial. We’re trying to support the idea that we don’t have to pay attention to this particular trivial claim. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 110
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms