LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 111 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 111 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 111 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A patient complained of feeling constantly fatigued…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

FACTS: A tired patient only slept 4-6 hours. This worsened their exhaustion, but doctors did not tell them to sleep more.

ANALYSIS: We can be pretty sure that the patient should sleep more. So we must explain the doctors’ advice.

The correct answer tells us that telling the patient to sleep might cause them to sleep less.

___________

  1. The patient doesn’t really care about awakening: they feel tired and want to sleep.
  2. But the other hours are still important: that’s why the patient’s low total sleep was contributing to their fatigue.
  3. That’s good for them. But this particular patient needs more sleep.
  4. We have no idea whether this patient has nightmares. And the last hour of sleep wasn’t mentioned. This is completely irrelevant.
  5. CORRECT. If you tell the patient to sleep more, then maybe they will worry and sleep less. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 111
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Aden says Member

    April 1, 2021 at 12:22 pm

    First of all who says telling someone will make them worry?
    Second of all who says he didnt already know about once it was determined as the problem for the lack of sleep?

    Reply
    • Rosalie (LSATHacks) says Tutor

      April 5, 2021 at 10:17 am

      That’s the assumption. As long as there is a possibility that telling someone would make them worry, then that’s the correct answer since it explains the paradox.

      I’m not sure what your second point is addressing. Can you clarify?

      Reply
      • Aden says Member

        April 5, 2021 at 4:26 pm

        My second point is that the stimulus says that it was determined that the 4 – 6 hrs of sleep contributed to his bad sleep condition, so why would O assume that he did not already know about that (which according to answer choice E would already be sufficient cause for worry)?

        Reply
        • Rosalie (LSATHacks) says Tutor

          April 7, 2021 at 12:10 pm

          The patient could (obviously would) know that he’s only sleeping four to six hours, but it’s possible that it’s not a concern for him. For example, many working professionals work long hours and after also taking care of household chores, they might end up with 4-6 hours of sleep. This would be considered their “norm” and might not inherently be a worrying thing until a doctor points it out. Also, the stimulus says that the patient complained of “feeling constantly fatigued,” not that he’s worrying that he’s not getting enough sleep. Be sure to differentiate between these premises and don’t assume they’re interchangeable. I think this is what the question is getting at.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms