• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSAT Courses
  • Tutoring
    • Tutoring
    • Mastery seminars
    • Course
    • Books
  • Blog
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 36 » Logical Reasoning 1 » Question 4

LSAT 36, Logical Reasoning I, Q4, LSATHacks

LSAT 36 Explanations

LR Question 4 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Most antidepressant drugs cause weight gain. While…

QUESTION TYPE: Most Strongly Supported

FACTS: Anti-depressants tend to cause weight gain. Dieting can help, but it’s virtually inevitable that you’ll gain some weight. 

ANALYSIS: It seems very obvious, but the stimulus supports the idea that people will likely gain weight if they take antidepressants. 

___________

  1. Hard to say. It might be more important to prevent depression even if the patient will gain weight.
  2. This is sort of like A. Treating depression might be even more important than weight gain for those patients. 
  3. CORRECT. The entire stimulus supports the idea that some people will likely gain weight. 
  4. We have no idea what causes the weight gain. If they gain it as a result of a pill then it’s unlikely diet is the main cause.
  5. We have no idea. Maybe there are some patients who could not safely diet. 

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Next Question




Free Logical Reasoning lesson

Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

Check out LSATHacks All Access

It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jacob says

    October 17, 2016 at 9:35 am

    This question gave me some troubles! The issue was I think at least one line of reasoning supports B. But there is a quirk to C which I think makes it right by elimination anyway, a quirk which I don’t know if you noticed.

    I initially went with B because I reasoned something like this: We’re not told whether or not people in general have a desperate need for antidepressants. All we know about the drugs and the people that take them is that the patients will likely gain weight because *most* of the drugs cause weight gain. The rest of the text just seems like filler. Thus, without any further information, I thought it was not legitimate to assume that people *need* the antidepressants – we’re just not told! B then presents us with people who are trying to lose weight. That’s a new assumption about our patients. I then combined that with my intuition that we cannot simply assume that these patients have some conflicting inherent *need* of the drugs and thought ‘yeah, if your goal is to lose weight and these drugs likely cause weight gain you shouldn’t ask for antidepressants. Case closed.’ (so in a way I’m not sure I agree/understand your justification for B).

    In my blind review of the question though I correctly switched to C. I noticed that B specifically says ‘an antidepressant’. But the question stem says only that ‘most’ antidepressants cause weight gain. Thus, it’s not true that *all* anti depressants cause weight gain, and thus is might not be unreasonable to ask for ‘an antidepressant’, or in other words, *some specific* antidepressant, one which might not cause weight gain. Thus, B is not supported by the stimulus. With C as the only reasonable choice left I went with C (whatever else I thought of it).

    As an aside, I went for a combined -11 across the LR sections of #36. This was a rough one for me.

    Reply
    • Jacob says

      October 17, 2016 at 9:37 am

      Whoops, I meant a quirk to B not C!

      Reply
    • TutorLucas (LSAT Hacks) says

      November 2, 2016 at 7:11 pm

      Thanks for your analysis of this question! Although you’re right to say that the stimulus doesn’t explicitly state that patients need anti-depressant drugs and therefore we shouldn’t make that assumption when we look at (B), this is a most strongly supported question. So, we also can’t assume that people who are trying to lose weight should prioritize weight loss over taking the drug. That’s going too far beyond the letter of the passage and answer choice. Also, I wouldn’t make the case against (B) on the basis of it saying “an anti-depressant drug”, because, again, then you’d have to assume that the patient was asking specifically for a drug that doesn’t cause weight gain.

      (C) is much more strongly supported because the first sentence tells us that most anti-depressants cause weight gain. When we combine that with some weight gain being unlikely to be preventable, we can say that (C) is closer to what we’re actually given in the passage.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks All Access: Get every course on LSATHacks + members only explanations

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for only $760 $349, satisfaction guaranteed. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/all-access/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2023 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping