LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 114 › Logical Reasoning › Question 1

LSAT 114 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q1

LSAT Preptest 114 explanations

LR Question 1 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Physician: In itself, exercise does not cause heart attacks…

QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption

CONCLUSION: The new health program will cause increased health risks for employees.

REASONING: A rapidly increased amount of exercise increases anyone’s risk of a heart attack.

ANALYSIS: The stimulus doesn’t tell us how hard people will exercise in the new program. It’s only sudden, increased exercise that causes an increased risk of heart disease.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This tells us that the exercise program is intense enough to cause an increase in heart disease risk. 
  2. This doesn’t necessarily mean much. It could be that both exercise programs are quite tame and involve less exercise than employees get outside of work. 
  3. This doesn’t tell us if there will be a sudden increase in exercise for those employees. It’s only a sudden increase that it harmful.
  4. A sudden change in policy is not the same thing as a sudden increase in exercise. 
  5. This doesn’t tell us if the new program is strenuous or not. 
↑ Return to PT 114
Next Question

More Resources for Sufficient Assumption Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Sufficient Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers sufficient assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. manjot says

    August 22, 2017 at 5:27 pm

    Can B be wrong because there is no mention of a previous health program as well?

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      August 23, 2017 at 1:26 pm

      I’d argue that the mention of the previous health program is pretty irrelevant to why this answer choice is incorrect. I can imagine scenarios where the previous health program was mentioned in an answer choice, and that answer choice was correct. For example, if the answer choice said something like “the new health program ensures a sudden increase in the amount of exercise for all employees in the previous health program,” that answer choice would be a very good one because it mentions the key to responding to this question: a sudden increase in the amount of exercise.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms