LSATHacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • LSAT Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Mastery Courses
  • Login
  •   Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 38 › Logical Reasoning 1 › Question 22

LSAT 38, Logical Reasoning I, Q22, LSATHacks

LSAT 38 Explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Damming the Merv River would provide irrigation…

QUESTION TYPE: Parallel Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Building a dam wouldn’t help agricultural productivity in the region.

REASONING: A dam would help the upstream lands but hurt the downstream lands even more.

ANALYSIS: This is a good argument. It shows that benefits in one area are outweighed by benefits in another area. The overall effect (on agriculture) is negative. The conclusion is mild: it only says the overall effect is not positive. 

___________

  1. This compares across areas (health vs. taste) whereas the stimulus compared agricultural benefits to agricultural drawbacks. Also, this doesn’t tell us that the benefits of less disease definitely outweigh the worse taste.
  2. This argument might be correct, but we would have to know whether businesses would also reduce their transatlantic phone calls.
  3. CORRECT. This compares time saved to time lost, and finds that time lost in city delays offsets time saved by the new highway. The conclusion matches the stimulus: it merely says the highway will not reduce transit time (actually, the highway would increase transit time.) 
  4. This is a bad argument. If an illness can’t be cured by rest alone then you ought to see a doctor. It only says diseases can often be cured at home.
  5. This is a bad argument. It could be that the only plants damaged by the chemical are weeds. In that case, many gardens could benefit. 

Previous Question
PT 38 /  PT 114
Next Question

More Resources for Parallel Reasoning Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Parallel Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers parallel reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Free Five Part LSAT Email Course

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Ultimate Bundle

Get the LSATHacks Mastery seminars, the Intro Course, the LSATHacks Mastery Toolkit and a Strategy Call. All for only $499, satisfaction guaranteed.

Buy now

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial
  • FAQ/Legal

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2025 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal