LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 114 › Logical Reasoning › Question 15

LSAT 114 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q15

LSAT Preptest 114 explanations

LR Question 15 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Loggerhead turtles live and breed in distinct groups…

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: It’s likely that young Baja peninsula loggerhead turtles hatched 10,000 kilometers away, in Japanese waters.

REASONING: Loggerhead turtles in the Baja peninsula have DNA that is 95% similar to that of loggerhead turtles near Japan.

ANALYSIS: This argument sounds persuasive. But it hasn’t told us how similar we should expect loggerhead DNA to be. Maybe all loggerheads have similar DNA, including those in the Atlantic.

___________

  1. This would just show the pacific group is widespread. It strengthens the argument.
  2. This tells us Atlantic turtles behave differently than Pacific turtles. It somewhat strengthens the argument. 
  3. This just tells us a fact about loggerhead population. It doesn’t show that the two populations aren’t different.
  4. CORRECT. This shows that Atlantic loggerheads have DNA similar to that of pacific loggerheads. This weakens the argument that the populations are distinct. 
  5. The argument didn’t say that the loggerheads couldn’t interbreed. It just said that they generally didn’t breed. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 114
Next Question

More Resources for Weaken Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. jj says Member

    May 4, 2020 at 12:50 am

    I’m not sure with your answer of A. How does this not weaken argument? If there was a nesting site was found off the north of Baja peninsula, I believe it would weaken the argument because then it does not mean that Pacific jouvenile turtles hatch in Japanese water, instead it was hatch on the north of Baja Peninsula.

    Reply
    • Graeme Blake says Founder

      June 15, 2020 at 2:27 pm

      First, the answer doesn’t say the nesting happens in the Baja peninsula. It says it happens “several thousand kilometres north of the Baja peninsula”.

      Second, “have been found” is very weak. It’s equivalent to “some”. This could be a handful of nesting sites. We’re concerned with what happens to the vast majority of turtles, and A doesn’t weaken the idea that almost all turtles hatch in Japan. There will always be exceptions to most rules, but that doesn’t mean the exceptions are significant.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms