LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 115 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 115 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 115 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Cognitive psychologist: The majority of skilled…

QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption

CONCLUSION: Some people who are good at abstract reasoning are famous

REASONING: Most skilled artists are creative, and everyone creative is good at abstract reasoning. Some skilled artists are not famous.

ANALYSIS: If only 10% of skilled artists are famous, then this isn’t a very good argument. Maybe those 10% of skilled artists aren’t part of the >50% of skills artists who are creative.

If we knew that more than half of skilled artists are famous, then we could combine that with the statement that more than half of skilled artists are creative and conclude that some famous people are creative and famous.

  • SA (most) F
  • SA (most) C

Whenever you have two most statements with the same term on the left, you can make a “some” statement by combining the two terms on the right. So some people who are famous are also creative and therefore skilled at abstract reasoning.

This isn’t always obvious, so I’ll try a simple numerical example. Imagine 3 families. Most of them have dogs, and most of them have cats. That means at least 1 family has both cats and dogs.

Two families must have cats, and two must have dogs. Family A and B have dogs. Family B and C have cats.

___________

  1. We already know this. Most skilled artists are good at abstract reasoning because most skilled artists are creative.
  2. This doesn’t tell us if any of them are famous.
  3. We already know this, it can’t help us.
  4. In our scenario, we already know that creative people are good at abstract reasoning. We didn’t have any example of someone being good at abstract reasoning without also having been creative.
  5. CORRECT. See the discussion in “Analysis.”

Recap: The question begins with “Cognitive psychologist: The majority of skilled”. It is a Sufficient Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Sufficient questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 115
Next Question

More Resources for Sufficient Assumption Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Sufficient Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers sufficient assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms