LSAT 41, Logical Reasoning I, Q14, LSATHacks

LR Question 14 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Laila: Though lying may be unacceptable in most cases…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle

CONCLUSION: Lying is morally permissible if it brings more good than harm.

ANALYSIS: We need two things: 1. evidence of a benefit; 2. not outweighed by other harm.

___________

1. Not bad is insufficient; his lie must lead to good.
2. No evidence of good done here. He might help his friend, but it’s hard to say if that is good or bad.
3. Not unless you’re helping yourself, and not harming others.
4. CORRECT. Yes. We have a benefit (helps Thomas), and proof that it is not outweighed by other harm.
5. There is a benefit, but also a risk of harm. It’s unclear if a lie is permissible.

Recap: The question begins with “Laila: Though lying may be unacceptable in most cases”. It is a Principle question. Learn more about LSAT Principle questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.