LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 5 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 5 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 5 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Naturalist: For decades we have known that the tuatara…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle

CONCLUSION: Humans must try to prevent the extinction of the South Island Tuatara (even if it means killing the Tuatara’s natural predators which are not endangered)

REASONING: It is now known that the South Island Tuatara is an independent species distinct from the North Island Tuatara. If it goes extinct on the South Island it will be extinct worldwide.

ANALYSIS: It’s hard to evaluate this argument. We don’t know how important it is to prevent a species becoming extinct, and whether it matters that we will have to kill animals. We will just need to look for some principle that supports the idea that we ought to protect animals from extinction.

___________

  1. This principle would have supported preserving the South Island Tuatara back when it was thought to merely be a local population of the larger New Zealand Tuatara species. The present conclusion is a bit different: we only need to preserve it since it is not merely a local population but instead the entire population of Tuataras.
  2. This doesn’t help, since we are interfering with the well being of other animals. We would have to kill the predators of the Tuatara.
  3. CORRECT. This works. When we thought the South Island Tuatara were just a local population of a larger species we had no obligation to save them. Now that they are the only population of a distinct species we must save them.
  4. We don’t know if it is human activity that is killing the Tuatara.
  5. This goes too far. If the South Island Tuatara weren’t going extinct it’s not clear we should favor them. This answer choice doesn’t specify that the isolated species has to be at any actual risk of extinction: they are simply more vulnerable by reason of being isolated.

Recap: The question begins with “Naturalist: For decades we have known that the tuatara”. It is a Principle question. Learn how to master LSAT Principle questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 5
Next Question

More Resources for Principle Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Principle questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers principle questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms