LSAT 6 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q20

LR Question 20 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Freedom of speech is not only a basic…

QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Freedom of speech is the only rational policy for this government to adopt.

REASONING: Free speech allows good ideas to flourish. Bad ideas can be shot down. There is no downside: nothing is ever gained by forcing citizens to communicate their thoughts secretly. And, it’s a basic human right.

ANALYSIS: This is a method of reasoning question asking how the adviser argues for free speech (not strictly what he’s arguing). They combine a moral claim (it’s a basic human right) with practical reasoning (it leads to better outcomes and avoids harms). So we’re looking for an answer that captures both of these aspects.

___________

1. That is not at all what the stimulus said. Free speech can exist as an idea even when free speech is denied.
2. The argument goes beyond this. Sure, basic rights are protected by freedom of speech. But it’s also the case that such a policy would be good for society and ideas as well.
3. CORRECT. Yes. Human rights are a moral idea. Freedom of speech supports them. It also offers pragmatic benefits to society: more good ideas, less bad ideas.
4. The stimulus doesn’t claim that freedom of speech can’t be suppressed. If the policy advisor thought that it is doubtful he would feel the need to try to persuade the government: freedom of speech would survive no matter what they did.
5. The argument is recommending freedom of speech as a rational policy. The policy advisor clearly believes the situation can be achieved in practice.

Recap: The question begins with “Freedom of speech is not only a basic”. It is a Method of Reasoning question. Learn more about LSAT Method of Reasoning questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.