LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 138 › Logical Reasoning › Question 5

LSAT 138 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q5

LSAT Preptest 138 explanations

LR Question 5 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Recent epidemiological studies report that Country X has…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

PARADOX: Country X has a lower rate of disease P, but people who have disease P are more likely to die.

ANALYSIS: On paradox questions, you must:

  1. Figure out why the situation is confusing.
  2. Figure out how to explain the confusion.

A lot of people skip step one. But you need to understand the confusion before you can explain it. Here, the confusion is that Country X seems to have both more and less of a problem with disease P.

As for the second point, a lot of people pick answers that are merely true, but explain nothing.

I thought of the answer in advance: “What if the reporting system sucks, so that only the most severe (and fatal) cases get reported?” Here’s a numerical example of how that might work:

  • In the country of Reportistan, there are 1000 cases of disease P, and doctors have reported every since one. 10 people have died.
  • In the country of Whocaresistan, there are 1000 cases of disease P, and 10 people died. But doctors only reported the 10 cases of death.

So in the second country, the disease seems rare but fatal. However, this is just a statistical illusion: the amount of disease P is the same in both countries.

___________

  1. This explains nothing about the reporting rate or about deaths.
  2. A tempting answer, but the paradox only refers to residents.
  3. CORRECT. This resolves the paradox. Country X actually has a higher rate of disease P, but the reported rate is low. Since only the most fatal cases are diagnosed, the death rate per number of reported cases is high. (The death rate per number of actual cases might not be.)
  4. So? The studies looked at overall incidence of disease P. Presumably they were able to take this fluctuation into account.
  5. Other illnesses don’t matter. We’re only talking about disease P.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 138
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms