LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 132 › Logical Reasoning › Question 20

LSAT 132 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q20

LSAT Preptest 132 explanations

LR Question 20 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Astronomer: Earlier estimates of the distances of…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

PARADOX: The stars are older than the universe, which can’t be true. If the new calculations are right, the stars are further away and intrinsically brighter than we thought.

ANALYSIS: This situation isn’t really a “paradox”, but I’ve kept the same name for the question type.

According to our old calculations, the stars are older than the universe. This is obviously impossible. The astronomer says the new calculations indicate the stars are younger, thus resolving the paradox. We have to explain how the new information means the stars are younger. We know two new things about the stars:

  1. They are further away than we thought.
  2. They are brighter than we thought.

One of these facts must show that the stars are not as old as we thought. That’s the only way that this new information can prove the stars aren’t older than the universe.

___________

  1. Useless. This has nothing to do with the astronomer’s calculations. We’re trying to explain how the calculations show the stars are younger than we thought.
  2. It doesn’t matter how old the universe is. However old it is, we want explain why the stars are less old.
  3. CORRECT. The astronomer found that the stars are brighter than we thought. So this answer shows that the stars are also younger than we thought.
  4. Tempting, but useless. This answer refers to the wrong concept. We’re still on earth. The stars appear just as bright as they always have.
    The astronomer’s calculations show that the stars are actually brighter than we thought. Intrinsic brightness refers to how bright stars really are, not how bright them appear to be.
  5. So what? We’re trying to explain how old the stars are. It doesn’t matter if we can see more stars. Whoop-dee-do. This has nothing to do with the astronomer’s findings.

Recap: The question begins with “Astronomer: Earlier estimates of the distances”. It is a Paradox question. To practice more Paradox questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 132
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms