LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 134 › Logical Reasoning › Question 22

LSAT 134 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q22

LSAT Preptest 134 explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Microbiologist: Because heavy metals are normally concentrated…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: Heavy metals in sludge make bacteria resistant to antibiotics.

REASONING: Heavy metals made bacteria resistant to heavy-metal poisoning.

ANALYSIS: This is a causation-correlation error. Humans brains (including yours) are wired to misunderstand correlations. We see that two things happen and assume that one causes the other. So the LSAC tests us on this quite a bit. But once you learn to recognize the error, the questions aren’t hard. They usually don’t add additional tricks. So remember: the fact that two things happen together doesn’t mean one causes the other.

You can strengthen a correlation/causation relationship by ruling out alternate explanations. You may know in real life that sewage is full of antibiotics. This is a plausible way to cause antibiotic resistance. You can strengthen the argument by ruling out this possibility. You’re definitely allowed to use outside knowledge to form hypotheses, as I just did.

___________

  1. So? Thankfully, most bacteria aren’t antibiotic resistant. And the stimulus said heavy-metal resistance is unusual. So we shouldn’t be surprised that most bacteria are vulnerable to both antibiotics and heavy metals.
  2. CORRECT. This amounts to a controlled experiment. Everything else is kept equal, except for heavy metals. And bacteria don’t become antibiotic resistant. So it must be the heavy metals that cause the resistance to antibiotics.
  3. This weakens the argument. It shows that the bacteria were likely antibiotic resistant already. They developed heavy-metal resistance as a result.
  4. This weakens the argument. It could be the antibiotics that cause antibiotic resistance.
  5. So? This is vague. Many could be “150 kinds of bacteria out of 10 trillion total”. And why are they resistant to both heavy metals and antibiotics? This does nothing to help prove that heavy-metals lead to antibiotic resistance.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 134
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms